Four cities, four different experiences

Learning from the local context for a joint strategy

Four cities, four different experiences

Learning from the local context for a joint strategy

Each case study area provides a unique point of view on biodiversity conservation. We group them in pairs by similar yet different features that allow us to compare their preservation methods.

Grenoble, France – Göttingen, Germany

Grenoble and Göttingen are medium-sized cities, both located in high and low mountain areas, whose conservation interest lies in maintaining multifunctional farmlands and forests of high ecological value.
The key difference between them is that, in Göttingen, land use is more intensive and the network of protected areas smaller and more fragmented than in Grenoble.

Cape Town, South Africa – Stockholm, Sweden

Cape Town and Stockholm, although both are large metropolitan cities, contrast strongly in terms of socioeconomic development and equity. While the former presents a high inequality between wealthy and poor areas of the city due to apartheid, these disparities are less evident in the latter.
The interest of this pair, with distinct history and government traditions, lies in the different conservation methods they practise on the vast fertile ground available to them.

Göttingen, GermanyGrenoble, France
Cape Town, South Africa Stockholm, Sweden

Each case study area provides a unique point of view on biodiversity conservation. We group them in pairs by similar yet different features that allow us to compare their preservation methods.

Grenoble, France – Göttingen, Germany

Grenoble and Göttingen are medium-sized cities, both located in high and low mountain areas, whose conservation interest lies in maintaining multifunctional farmlands and forests of high ecological value. The key difference between them is that, in Göttingen, land use is more intensive and the network of protected areas smaller and more fragmented than in Grenoble.

Cape Town, South Africa – Stockholm, Sweden

Cape Town and Stockholm, although both are large metropolitan cities, contrast strongly in terms of socioeconomic development and equity. While the former presents a high inequality between wealthy and poor areas of the city due to apartheid, these disparities are less evident in the latter. The interest of this pair, with distinct history and government traditions, lies in the different conservation methods they practise on the vast fertile ground available to them.

Göttingen, GermanyGrenoble, France
Cape Town, South AfricaStockholm, Sweden